My Apologies

 I know I said I re-started this site because there seemed to be an issue I could not determine through Google and AdSense but it appears that I have the same issue here which fails to allow me to reach an audience.   I am begining to believe that the "policy violation" that they are now claiming is a "new" one and involves true crime itself.

To be honest I have not checked into this in quite a while because I became overly frustrated trying to deal with it.  It appears that if this is the route that I want to continue to take that Blogger.com may not be the format for me.  

Hopefully sometime in the near future I will dig deep into things again.  On that note I have been diving deep into the Delphi Murders and have watched and gotten involved in several podcasts related to the case.  I am expecially partical to The Defense Diaries and CriminaliTY on YouTube so if this is also something you are interested in those podcasts are very good.  

Comments

  1. Audree FlynnJune 26, 2026 at 9:36 PM

    Hi, my name is Audree, I am also a true crime buff, just discovered your blog and I'm enjoying it immensely. I needed some info on Paul Komiyatti and that brought me here. I'm sorry you were having so much trouble with Google and/or AdSense. But I know how it is. I had sort of a murder blog at one time, devoted solely to the Paul Bernardo-Karla Homolka case in Canada, and trying to cover all the complexities of just one case is hard enough. You covered far more, past and present. It is commendable, I think. If you're still writing, I would like to read more of your posts.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

McDonald's Hot Coffee and How it Damaged Us All

  This case is different than any I have done so far, but will not likely be the last of its kind that you will see here. This is a civil case, not a criminal case, and does not involve a murder. Civil cases are much different, and have different rules than criminal cases. Most will tell you that the biggest thing is the standard used to find a “defendant,” more commonly called a respondent in civil cases, guilty or responsible. In criminal cases it is “beyond a reasonable doubt” while in civil cases it is a “preponderance of the evidence.” This is important because criminal cases generally involve taking the freedom of someone. In civil cases it is generally about punishing someone financially. Another big difference between the two types of courts is that when all is said and done in civil courts a percentage of responsibility is often allotted to all of the parties involved and that can include the person who brought the lawsuit. This case is not only about hot coffe...
Read more

Jeffrey MacDonald and Fatal Vision

  Once again this has become a blog in which I have started, erased, started again and erased again. The Jeffrey MacDonald case is an extremely long and complicated case. In fact, it has been called one of the “most litigated” and the “longest” criminal/murder case in U.S. History. The murders of MacDonald's pregnant wife and two young daughters occurred in 1970. There was an Article 32 Hearing through the Army in 1970 that ended with a recommendation that charges be dropped against him but no actual trial. Over the next several years both the Army and the Federal Government were investigating the murders and MacDonald remained their prime suspect. He was officially federally indicted on three counts of murder in January of 1975. For the next few years things were in and out of the courts considering whether there were issues involving double jeopardy or MacDonald's right to a speedy trial. MacDonald finally went to trial in July of 1979 and was convicted. However, t...
Read more